The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Am J Psychiatry 2009; 166:1002-1010
(published online August 3, 2009; doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08121909)
© 2009 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
* Articles by Asarnow, J. R.
* Articles by Wells, K. B.
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Asarnow, J. R.
* Articles by Wells, K. B.
Related Collections
* Depression
* Outpatient Services
*Related Article

Long-Term Benefits of Short-Term Quality Improvement Interventions for Depressed Youths in Primary Care

Joan Rosenbaum Asarnow, Ph.D., Lisa H. Jaycox, Ph.D., Lingqi Tang, Ph.D., Naihua Duan, Ph.D., Anne P. LaBorde, Ph.D., Psy.D., Luis R. Zeledon, M.D., Martin Anderson, M.D., M.P.H., Pamela J. Murray, M.D., M.H.P., Christopher Landon, M.D., Margaret M. Rea, Ph.D., and Kenneth B. Wells, M.D., M.P.H.

OBJECTIVE: Quality improvement programs for depressed youths in primary care settings have been shown to improve 6-month clinical outcomes, but longer-term outcomes are unknown. The authors examined 6-, 12-, and 18-month outcomes of a primary care quality improvement intervention. METHOD: Primary care patients 13–21 years of age with current depressive symptoms were randomly assigned to a 6-month quality improvement intervention (N=211) or to treatment as usual enhanced with provider training (N=207). The quality improvement intervention featured expert leader teams to oversee implementation of the intervention; clinical care managers trained in cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression to support patient evaluation and treatment; and support for patient and provider choice of treatments. RESULTS: The quality improvement intervention, relative to enhanced treatment as usual, lowered the likelihood of severe depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale score ≥24) at 6 months; a similar trend at 18 months was not statistically significant. Path analyses revealed a significant indirect intervention effect on long-term depression due to the initial intervention improvement at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized effectiveness trial of a primary care quality improvement intervention for depressed youths, the main effect of the intervention on outcomes was to decrease the likelihood of severe depression at the 6-month outcome assessment. These early intervention-related improvements conferred additional long-term protection through a favorable shift in illness course through 12 and 18 months.


Related Article:

In This Issue
Am J Psychiatry 2009 166: A16. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
J. V. Campo and J. A. Bridge
Treatment of Youth Depression
Am J Psychiatry, September 1, 2009; 166(9): 958 - 960.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2009 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org