The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Am J Psychiatry 2009; 166:182-188
(published online October 15, 2008; doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08050645)
© 2009 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* CME: Take the course for this article:
AJP CME Course for February 2009: Older Adults' Attitudes Toward Enrollment...
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Karlawish, J.
* Articles by Sankar, P.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Karlawish, J.
* Articles by Sankar, P.
Related Collections
* Informed Consent
* Alzheimer's Disease
*Related Article

Older Adults’ Attitudes Toward Enrollment of Non-competent Subjects Participating in Alzheimer’s Research

Jason Karlawish, M.D., Jonathan Rubright, M.S., David Casarett, M.D., Mark Cary, Ph.D., Thomas Ten Have, Ph.D., and Pamela Sankar, Ph.D.

OBJECTIVE: Research that seeks to enroll noncompetent patients with Alzheimer’s disease without presenting any potential benefit to participants is the source of substantial ethical controversy. The authors used hypothetical Alzheimer’s disease studies that included either a blood draw or a blood draw and lumbar puncture to explore older persons’ attitudes on this question. METHOD: Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 538 persons age 65 and older. Questions explored participants’ understanding of research concepts, their views on enrolling persons with Alzheimer’s disease in research, and their preferences regarding having a proxy decision maker, granting advance consent, and granting their proxy leeway to override the participant’s decision. Additional questions assessed altruism, trust, value for research, and perceptions of Alzheimer’s disease. RESULTS: The majority (83%) were willing to grant advance consent to a blood draw study, and nearly half (48%) to a blood draw plus lumbar puncture study. Most (96%) were willing to identify a proxy for research decision making, and most were willing to grant their proxy leeway over their advance consent: 81% for the blood draw study and 70% for the blood draw plus lumbar puncture study. Combining the preferences for advance consent and leeway, the proportion who would permit being enrolled in the blood draw and lumbar puncture studies, respectively, were 92% and 75%. Multivariate models showed that willingness to be enrolled in research was most strongly associated with a favorable attitude toward biomedical research. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults generally support enrolling noncompetent persons with Alzheimer’s disease into research that does not present a benefit to subjects. Willingness to grant their proxy leeway over advance consent and a favorable attitude about biomedical research substantially explain this willingness.


Related Article:

In This Issue
Am J Psychiatry 2009 166: A18. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
S. Eth and G. B. Leong
Toward Revising the Ethical Boundaries of Research With Noncompetent Subjects
Am J Psychiatry, February 1, 2009; 166(2): 131 - 134.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2009 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org